<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your bias is showing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:33:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldManMontgomery</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2771</link>
		<dc:creator>OldManMontgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2771</guid>
		<description>Interesting word, &#039;bias&#039;.  The gist of the article cited seems relatively friendly toward the subject, one Alex Black.  It identifies him as a retired firefighter (therefore reasonably upstanding, I suppose) and not an urban criminal or drug dealer.

The author implies not only he thinks firearms are the mark of criminal activity, he expects everyone thinks the same way.  This is not an isolated instance.

In every instance of fascist power grab, the fascists have submitted an &#039;enemy&#039;; usually an identifiable boogeyman.  In 1920s and &#039;30s Germany, it was the Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals and other &#039;undesireables&#039;; but let&#039;s not dwell on the past.

I see the modern U. S. would be fascists are - have been - building up an &#039;enemy&#039; against whom to unite (and surrender power to the fascists to fix things).  The current boogeyman in the current United States seem to have three faces - not interchangable but with enough overlap to &#039;unite&#039; against.

Smokers, gun owners and global warming deniers.  And church goers, especially Christian.

Smokers jack up the price of healthcare and kill others with second hand smoke.  Gotta be stopped.

Gun owners are just dangerous people with way too many &#039;unregistered&#039; guns (the evilest sort) and are just itching to shoot someone.  Anyone.  Anytime.  For any reason.  Or no reason.

Global warming deniers.  Those people are responsible for the high cost of gasoline, smog, drowning polar bears, droughts and hurricanes.  They drive SUVs which don&#039;t even have to stay on the paved road.  (And they blaspheme Al Gore.)

Church goers.  Well.  They&#039;re the ones who block sexual activities taught to grade school kids and want to instill some concept of morality and decency in youth.  They&#039;re so narrow minded about AIDS and unwed pregnancies and unwanted children and such.

And all these four groups have the audacity and politically incorrect inclination to dare think for themselves instead of the socialist glop promoted by the elite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting word, &#8216;bias&#8217;.  The gist of the article cited seems relatively friendly toward the subject, one Alex Black.  It identifies him as a retired firefighter (therefore reasonably upstanding, I suppose) and not an urban criminal or drug dealer.</p>
<p>The author implies not only he thinks firearms are the mark of criminal activity, he expects everyone thinks the same way.  This is not an isolated instance.</p>
<p>In every instance of fascist power grab, the fascists have submitted an &#8216;enemy&#8217;; usually an identifiable boogeyman.  In 1920s and &#8217;30s Germany, it was the Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals and other &#8216;undesireables&#8217;; but let&#8217;s not dwell on the past.</p>
<p>I see the modern U. S. would be fascists are &#8211; have been &#8211; building up an &#8216;enemy&#8217; against whom to unite (and surrender power to the fascists to fix things).  The current boogeyman in the current United States seem to have three faces &#8211; not interchangable but with enough overlap to &#8216;unite&#8217; against.</p>
<p>Smokers, gun owners and global warming deniers.  And church goers, especially Christian.</p>
<p>Smokers jack up the price of healthcare and kill others with second hand smoke.  Gotta be stopped.</p>
<p>Gun owners are just dangerous people with way too many &#8216;unregistered&#8217; guns (the evilest sort) and are just itching to shoot someone.  Anyone.  Anytime.  For any reason.  Or no reason.</p>
<p>Global warming deniers.  Those people are responsible for the high cost of gasoline, smog, drowning polar bears, droughts and hurricanes.  They drive SUVs which don&#8217;t even have to stay on the paved road.  (And they blaspheme Al Gore.)</p>
<p>Church goers.  Well.  They&#8217;re the ones who block sexual activities taught to grade school kids and want to instill some concept of morality and decency in youth.  They&#8217;re so narrow minded about AIDS and unwed pregnancies and unwanted children and such.</p>
<p>And all these four groups have the audacity and politically incorrect inclination to dare think for themselves instead of the socialist glop promoted by the elite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.W. Drang</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>D.W. Drang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>Clopclop
Clopclop
Clopclop
Click
Fsssssss
Boom!
Amish drive-by...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clopclop<br />
Clopclop<br />
Clopclop<br />
Click<br />
Fsssssss<br />
Boom!<br />
Amish drive-by&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aepilot_jim</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Aepilot_jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>Right, Tam just brought up the mental image of a bunch of thugs swinging by in a connestoga wagon, flipping up the tarp and swinging the gattling into action.  Then with a crack of the whip and a &quot;GEEEUp, thar!&quot; off they go clattering around the corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, Tam just brought up the mental image of a bunch of thugs swinging by in a connestoga wagon, flipping up the tarp and swinging the gattling into action.  Then with a crack of the whip and a &#8220;GEEEUp, thar!&#8221; off they go clattering around the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2768</guid>
		<description>It would have been nice for the story to mention how much he shelled out for that original .45-70 Gatling (HINT: nice car) and its size &amp; weight.

That&#039;s why you hear about so many old Gatlings being used in drive-bys and food court massacrees.

(Coincidentally, that&#039;s what has always puzzled me about the public freakout when they find out that you can own cannon. I personally can&#039;t think of a firearm less suited to criminal misuse than a towed 105.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have been nice for the story to mention how much he shelled out for that original .45-70 Gatling (HINT: nice car) and its size &amp; weight.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why you hear about so many old Gatlings being used in drive-bys and food court massacrees.</p>
<p>(Coincidentally, that&#8217;s what has always puzzled me about the public freakout when they find out that you can own cannon. I personally can&#8217;t think of a firearm less suited to criminal misuse than a towed 105.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Allen</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2767</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s sad that the term &quot;Machine Gun&quot; has a bad connotation to it in the first place. Really, who cares if it&#039;s a machine gun? People who own them are quite unlikely to use them for anything nefarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sad that the term &#8220;Machine Gun&#8221; has a bad connotation to it in the first place. Really, who cares if it&#8217;s a machine gun? People who own them are quite unlikely to use them for anything nefarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alcibiades McZombie</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2766</link>
		<dc:creator>Alcibiades McZombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/12/your-bias-is-showing-2/#comment-2766</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s apparently some debate whether the Gatling Gun is considered a &quot;manual machine gun&quot;.  I&#039;m on the side that says it&#039;s just a repeater.  (Work the action, fire, repeat.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s apparently some debate whether the Gatling Gun is considered a &#8220;manual machine gun&#8221;.  I&#8217;m on the side that says it&#8217;s just a repeater.  (Work the action, fire, repeat.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

