<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I am going to disagree</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:33:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Hatfield</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2905</link>
		<dc:creator>W. Hatfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2905</guid>
		<description>Assegai up jacksey, bowled unboko.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assegai up jacksey, bowled unboko.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Bruce</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2903</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2903</guid>
		<description>Two words: Boar. Spear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words: Boar. Spear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2902</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2902</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take a digging bar over any sword for home defence.

As far as swods go, I&#039;d go with a modern (civil war) sabre. Light, strong, can deflect most kinds of attacks and comes with a fistguard that doubles as a pair of dusters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take a digging bar over any sword for home defence.</p>
<p>As far as swods go, I&#8217;d go with a modern (civil war) sabre. Light, strong, can deflect most kinds of attacks and comes with a fistguard that doubles as a pair of dusters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alcibiades McZombie</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2901</link>
		<dc:creator>Alcibiades McZombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2901</guid>
		<description>For simplicity, I&#039;d go with a spear.  That should be able to defeat wannabe samurai (or whatever).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For simplicity, I&#8217;d go with a spear.  That should be able to defeat wannabe samurai (or whatever).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2904</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2904</guid>
		<description>I will (and have when things went bump in the night) go with the Katana. . .  but that is because I have trained with it.  Like any other weapon, the sword you are best with will be the one you train with, and what works for me may not work for you.  BTW you can stab with a katana too, they have a nice point = )

For lenght issues go with the shorter wakizashi. . . works as well but in a shorter package. . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will (and have when things went bump in the night) go with the Katana. . .  but that is because I have trained with it.  Like any other weapon, the sword you are best with will be the one you train with, and what works for me may not work for you.  BTW you can stab with a katana too, they have a nice point = )</p>
<p>For lenght issues go with the shorter wakizashi. . . works as well but in a shorter package. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJR</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2906</link>
		<dc:creator>JJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2906</guid>
		<description>I sometimes look fondly at the Scottish broadsword on www.coldsteel.com
And the Scottish dirk is nice, too.

It would be nice to have a symbol of my heritage that is also functional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sometimes look fondly at the Scottish broadsword on <a href="http://www.coldsteel.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coldsteel.com</a><br />
And the Scottish dirk is nice, too.</p>
<p>It would be nice to have a symbol of my heritage that is also functional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peregrinus</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2908</link>
		<dc:creator>Peregrinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2908</guid>
		<description>I have a fondness for the Katana, but that&#039;s more that the weapon fits my style better (I prefer a slashing motion over a stabbing one), but I&#039;d personally like to learn how to use a Jian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a fondness for the Katana, but that&#8217;s more that the weapon fits my style better (I prefer a slashing motion over a stabbing one), but I&#8217;d personally like to learn how to use a Jian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Gwinn</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2907</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Gwinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2907</guid>
		<description>They chopped with it too, but I think his point is that the short swords used by Roman/Greek hoplites were pretty specialized stuff.  They were used by armies whose infantry tactics were based on massed formations using large, overlapping shields to form a large front.  They were used at bad-breath distance as the formation literally pressed the enemy, pushing the front ranks back and crushing everyone.  They worked well in that role, but  what design works best depends on what you want to do with it.

The japanese did make some very good swords *for their purposes* but a lot of people get so tired of the mystical fetishization of the almighty katana that there&#039;s a backlash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They chopped with it too, but I think his point is that the short swords used by Roman/Greek hoplites were pretty specialized stuff.  They were used by armies whose infantry tactics were based on massed formations using large, overlapping shields to form a large front.  They were used at bad-breath distance as the formation literally pressed the enemy, pushing the front ranks back and crushing everyone.  They worked well in that role, but  what design works best depends on what you want to do with it.</p>
<p>The japanese did make some very good swords *for their purposes* but a lot of people get so tired of the mystical fetishization of the almighty katana that there&#8217;s a backlash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2910</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2910</guid>
		<description>thrusts, not chops.  Other than that, you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thrusts, not chops.  Other than that, you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalium</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2909</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/03/25/i-am-going-to-disagree/#comment-2909</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but wasn&#039;t the gladius designed for short, quick, and powerful chops in shieldwall formation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but wasn&#8217;t the gladius designed for short, quick, and powerful chops in shieldwall formation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

