<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guns &#8216;n meat is back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/03/guns-n-meat-is-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/03/guns-n-meat-is-back/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:33:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirtCrashr</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/03/guns-n-meat-is-back/#comment-3764</link>
		<dc:creator>DirtCrashr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/06/03/guns-n-meat-is-back/#comment-3764</guid>
		<description>Fictional theology more like -- it&#039;s some kind of new-agey, Church of the Herbacious Vegetarian Theology, no meat and no guns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fictional theology more like &#8212; it&#8217;s some kind of new-agey, Church of the Herbacious Vegetarian Theology, no meat and no guns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Morris</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/03/guns-n-meat-is-back/#comment-3763</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/06/03/guns-n-meat-is-back/#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>Calling it &quot;poorly reasoned theology&quot; is far too generous.  The mere presence of scriptural quotes does not make this theology.  It is just agenda, politics, and sacrilege.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling it &#8220;poorly reasoned theology&#8221; is far too generous.  The mere presence of scriptural quotes does not make this theology.  It is just agenda, politics, and sacrilege.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

