<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NSSF Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/24/nssf-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/24/nssf-report/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:34:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3934</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3934</guid>
		<description>Thain --

If you act like it&#039;s something of which to be ashamed, people are going to treat it that way.  We don&#039;t have to go out of our way to alienate the public, but these kind of contortions are a game we can&#039;t win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thain &#8211;</p>
<p>If you act like it&#8217;s something of which to be ashamed, people are going to treat it that way.  We don&#8217;t have to go out of our way to alienate the public, but these kind of contortions are a game we can&#8217;t win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3938</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3938</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t necessarily disagree, but the way the report was &lt;i&gt;presented&lt;/i&gt; it ended up looking bad for us.  Plus, it had a lot of other stuff in there I didn&#039;t like too much, like talk of &quot;non-lethal firearms&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily disagree, but the way the report was <i>presented</i> it ended up looking bad for us.  Plus, it had a lot of other stuff in there I didn&#8217;t like too much, like talk of &#8220;non-lethal firearms&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thain</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3937</link>
		<dc:creator>Thain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3937</guid>
		<description>There is also the simple fact that, well, the action item isn&#039;t wrong.

&quot;[T]here is much resistance among the general public to target shooting at human silhouettes...&quot;

The &#039;general public&#039; refers to those Americans doesn&#039;t own firearms, own the hunting rifle grampappy gave them but don&#039;t use it, or pure Fudds.  All of whom vote for &quot;reasonable&quot; gun control because the true Antis bambozzle them with images of full auto AK-47s and then pass laws banning Mini-14s.

&quot;[I]mages showing this will not be as well-received as alternative images.&quot;

People equate bull&#039;s eye targets with &quot;harmless&quot; games, such as darts or the archery game at the county fair.  They see a human silhouette and (correctly) equate it with practicing shooting humans... which they don&#039;t think of as a sport.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m all about the handguns and have never and probably will never go hunting.  But we&#039;re talking about a group that wants to sell the unwashed masses on sport shooting. A happy kid with a cricket and a bull&#039;s eye &quot;sells&quot; better than a guy with a Glock and a silhouette.

When I try to introduce my wife to Japanese cooking, I start with yakisoba, terriyaki, and Ahi tuna.  Sashimi, salmon roe, and the more exotic stuff can wait....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also the simple fact that, well, the action item isn&#8217;t wrong.</p>
<p>&#8220;[T]here is much resistance among the general public to target shooting at human silhouettes&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8216;general public&#8217; refers to those Americans doesn&#8217;t own firearms, own the hunting rifle grampappy gave them but don&#8217;t use it, or pure Fudds.  All of whom vote for &#8220;reasonable&#8221; gun control because the true Antis bambozzle them with images of full auto AK-47s and then pass laws banning Mini-14s.</p>
<p>&#8220;[I]mages showing this will not be as well-received as alternative images.&#8221;</p>
<p>People equate bull&#8217;s eye targets with &#8220;harmless&#8221; games, such as darts or the archery game at the county fair.  They see a human silhouette and (correctly) equate it with practicing shooting humans&#8230; which they don&#8217;t think of as a sport.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m all about the handguns and have never and probably will never go hunting.  But we&#8217;re talking about a group that wants to sell the unwashed masses on sport shooting. A happy kid with a cricket and a bull&#8217;s eye &#8220;sells&#8221; better than a guy with a Glock and a silhouette.</p>
<p>When I try to introduce my wife to Japanese cooking, I start with yakisoba, terriyaki, and Ahi tuna.  Sashimi, salmon roe, and the more exotic stuff can wait&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3935</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3935</guid>
		<description>I do remember from my academy days that when we&#039;d shoot against the MIT pistol team that they had a big sign on their range that said roughly &quot;thou shalt not shoot at silhouette targets&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do remember from my academy days that when we&#8217;d shoot against the MIT pistol team that they had a big sign on their range that said roughly &#8220;thou shalt not shoot at silhouette targets&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turk Turon</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3936</link>
		<dc:creator>Turk Turon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/06/24/nssf-report/#comment-3936</guid>
		<description>I may be completely mistaken here, but I seem to recall a law, or maybe a proposed law, in Massachusetts which made it a misdemeanor for anyone except a LEO to shoot at a paper &quot;torso&quot; target of any kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be completely mistaken here, but I seem to recall a law, or maybe a proposed law, in Massachusetts which made it a misdemeanor for anyone except a LEO to shoot at a paper &#8220;torso&#8221; target of any kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

