<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1911 vs. Glock?  Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Less</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4403</link>
		<dc:creator>Less</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4403</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;...1911 was a gleam in John Moses Browning (PBUH)’s eye, the Smith &amp; Wesson .38 Special was dispatching goblins with regularity…&lt;/i&gt;

The .38 Spc is from ~1899... The .45 ACP was developed in 1904. 5 years is not &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; big of a difference...

Shoot what you can afford to feed and what makes you happy... but most importantly, &lt;b&gt;go shooting!&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230;1911 was a gleam in John Moses Browning (PBUH)’s eye, the Smith &amp; Wesson .38 Special was dispatching goblins with regularity…</i></p>
<p>The .38 Spc is from ~1899&#8230; The .45 ACP was developed in 1904. 5 years is not <b>that</b> big of a difference&#8230;</p>
<p>Shoot what you can afford to feed and what makes you happy&#8230; but most importantly, <b>go shooting!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTownTejas</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>HTownTejas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>I carry a Kahr PM9 regularly because I can forget it&#039;s there.  Been carrying in a proper outside-the-waistband holster though.  does anyone have a particularly good IWB and/or pocket holster recommendation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I carry a Kahr PM9 regularly because I can forget it&#8217;s there.  Been carrying in a proper outside-the-waistband holster though.  does anyone have a particularly good IWB and/or pocket holster recommendation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carteach0</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator>Carteach0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4401</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got nothing against Glocks, except the ugly issue.  Lets be honest here... I can&#039;t afford to bash &#039;ugly, because I are one

I like my 1911 type pistol, and I shoot it fairly well.

I would probably like a Glock, should someone give me one.

There are very few firearms I can&#039;t find some redeeming value for.... even a .38 Davis derringer I own is very nice for shooting blanks out of (g).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got nothing against Glocks, except the ugly issue.  Lets be honest here&#8230; I can&#8217;t afford to bash &#8216;ugly, because I are one</p>
<p>I like my 1911 type pistol, and I shoot it fairly well.</p>
<p>I would probably like a Glock, should someone give me one.</p>
<p>There are very few firearms I can&#8217;t find some redeeming value for&#8230;. even a .38 Davis derringer I own is very nice for shooting blanks out of (g).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4407</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4407</guid>
		<description>personally, I do not like the grip or the grip angle on a Glock. That said, when someone asks me about picking our their first handgun, I always recommend that they shoot a Glock first.

One simple reason behind that, they work. You can abuse them, you can beat the hell out of them, you can never clean them, they will still work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally, I do not like the grip or the grip angle on a Glock. That said, when someone asks me about picking our their first handgun, I always recommend that they shoot a Glock first.</p>
<p>One simple reason behind that, they work. You can abuse them, you can beat the hell out of them, you can never clean them, they will still work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4409</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4409</guid>
		<description>Weer&#039;d Beard, I got a Kahr PM9 in the spring and love it.  Great pocket gun, and a lot more punch than a .380 or .38 Special.  Tight, great finish, and light.  Of course, it&#039;s a lively gun to shoot due to its size, but manageable.

My bedside gun (and winter/car trip carry gun) is a Glock 30 (.45 ACP).  It may be ugly, but when the fit hits the shan, a big, ugly gun with a gaping hole in the front isn&#039;t a bad thing to have.  I&#039;ll take every advantage I can in a gun fight, even if it&#039;s the fleeting &quot;Oh crap&quot; thought running through the BG&#039;s head.  No safety to forget and leave on, no hammer to cock, just a trigger squeeze and a loud bang.

The Kahr also scored points in the pocket gun search because it&#039;s action is similar to my Glock.  Striker fired, no external safety to worry about.  Draw, aim, squeeze, bang.

But I must confess I&#039;ve ogled a few shiny bright 1911&#039;s with their wood grip panels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weer&#8217;d Beard, I got a Kahr PM9 in the spring and love it.  Great pocket gun, and a lot more punch than a .380 or .38 Special.  Tight, great finish, and light.  Of course, it&#8217;s a lively gun to shoot due to its size, but manageable.</p>
<p>My bedside gun (and winter/car trip carry gun) is a Glock 30 (.45 ACP).  It may be ugly, but when the fit hits the shan, a big, ugly gun with a gaping hole in the front isn&#8217;t a bad thing to have.  I&#8217;ll take every advantage I can in a gun fight, even if it&#8217;s the fleeting &#8220;Oh crap&#8221; thought running through the BG&#8217;s head.  No safety to forget and leave on, no hammer to cock, just a trigger squeeze and a loud bang.</p>
<p>The Kahr also scored points in the pocket gun search because it&#8217;s action is similar to my Glock.  Striker fired, no external safety to worry about.  Draw, aim, squeeze, bang.</p>
<p>But I must confess I&#8217;ve ogled a few shiny bright 1911&#8242;s with their wood grip panels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weer'd Beard</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4408</link>
		<dc:creator>Weer'd Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4408</guid>
		<description>Great post, and my thoughts exactly.   I like 1911s... a lot!   But I&#039;m in no way a fanboy.  If somebody offers to let me run a mag through their glock, I&#039;ll say &quot;no thanks&quot;, that doesn&#039;t make me a hater.   I just have never enjoyed shooting a Glock for various ergonomic reasons, and the uglyness is just iceing on the cake.   1911s shoot good for me, and feel right in my hand, and the ones I have run like champs (Though I&#039;ve shot several that jam like crazy).

That&#039;s it!  I&#039;m not against plastic (I want a Kahr DESPERATLY, and when the trigger has been shined up, and the mag disconnect is chopped off I really dig the S&amp;W M&amp;P) and I LOVE my Colt Trooper Revolver.   But if I want a shooting Iron in my hand, I want a 1911, for no other reason than they fit me well, and because of that I enjoy shooting them, and because of THAT I&#039;ve ran more rounds through 1911 pattern guns than any two other gun types around.

That means when the shit hits the fan, the 1911 is the best choice.

Of course when talking to a new shooter I NEVER omit &quot;Make sure you try out a Glock&quot; always comes from me, because so many do LOVE theirs, it would be foolish to call it a &quot;Dumb Fad&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, and my thoughts exactly.   I like 1911s&#8230; a lot!   But I&#8217;m in no way a fanboy.  If somebody offers to let me run a mag through their glock, I&#8217;ll say &#8220;no thanks&#8221;, that doesn&#8217;t make me a hater.   I just have never enjoyed shooting a Glock for various ergonomic reasons, and the uglyness is just iceing on the cake.   1911s shoot good for me, and feel right in my hand, and the ones I have run like champs (Though I&#8217;ve shot several that jam like crazy).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it!  I&#8217;m not against plastic (I want a Kahr DESPERATLY, and when the trigger has been shined up, and the mag disconnect is chopped off I really dig the S&amp;W M&amp;P) and I LOVE my Colt Trooper Revolver.   But if I want a shooting Iron in my hand, I want a 1911, for no other reason than they fit me well, and because of that I enjoy shooting them, and because of THAT I&#8217;ve ran more rounds through 1911 pattern guns than any two other gun types around.</p>
<p>That means when the shit hits the fan, the 1911 is the best choice.</p>
<p>Of course when talking to a new shooter I NEVER omit &#8220;Make sure you try out a Glock&#8221; always comes from me, because so many do LOVE theirs, it would be foolish to call it a &#8220;Dumb Fad&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay G.</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4404</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4404</guid>
		<description>And then us old fogeys fire up the coal-powered PCs and remind you whippersnappers that long before the 1911 was a gleam in John Moses Browning (PBUH)&#039;s eye, the Smith &amp; Wesson .38 Special was dispatching goblins with regularity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then us old fogeys fire up the coal-powered PCs and remind you whippersnappers that long before the 1911 was a gleam in John Moses Browning (PBUH)&#8217;s eye, the Smith &amp; Wesson .38 Special was dispatching goblins with regularity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4406</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4406</guid>
		<description>Function has a beauty all its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Function has a beauty all its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeH</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4405</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/07/29/1911-vs-glock-again/#comment-4405</guid>
		<description>Aesthetics play a part for most of us. I wouldn&#039;t buy a Glock for the same reason I wouldn&#039;t buy a Honda Element, some machinery is just too butt ugly to look at on a regular basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aesthetics play a part for most of us. I wouldn&#8217;t buy a Glock for the same reason I wouldn&#8217;t buy a Honda Element, some machinery is just too butt ugly to look at on a regular basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

