<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compare and contrast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4602</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4602</guid>
		<description>Leon,

You&#039;re the only one who said anything like that.  Personally, I&#039;m a Republican because I like guns, I am pro-life, I&#039;m fiscally conservative, I don&#039;t like government healthcare...but I guess I&#039;m just another brainwashed zombie.

Most of my readers don&#039;t define their political stances based on one issue, they make the decision to be conservative or liberal based on an entire set of values.

In fact, I don&#039;t agree with my party all the time.  I wish they&#039;d stop trying to ban gay marriage, for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re the only one who said anything like that.  Personally, I&#8217;m a Republican because I like guns, I am pro-life, I&#8217;m fiscally conservative, I don&#8217;t like government healthcare&#8230;but I guess I&#8217;m just another brainwashed zombie.</p>
<p>Most of my readers don&#8217;t define their political stances based on one issue, they make the decision to be conservative or liberal based on an entire set of values.</p>
<p>In fact, I don&#8217;t agree with my party all the time.  I wish they&#8217;d stop trying to ban gay marriage, for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4601</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4601</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s disgusting how brain-washedly polarized you all are on political issues.  Maybe you should look at things issue-by-issue instead of saying &quot;REPUBLUCANS LIEK GUNS SO IM REPUBLUCAN LOL.&quot;  Defining your entire political stance based on a single issue is just moronic, and blaming the &quot;elite left&quot; for all your woes is equally dumb.

My point is this:  Both sides of the political spectrum have their idiots; it&#039;s your duty as an American to NOT be blinded by partisan rhetoric.  Quit being so goddamn right-wing JUST because you like guns!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s disgusting how brain-washedly polarized you all are on political issues.  Maybe you should look at things issue-by-issue instead of saying &#8220;REPUBLUCANS LIEK GUNS SO IM REPUBLUCAN LOL.&#8221;  Defining your entire political stance based on a single issue is just moronic, and blaming the &#8220;elite left&#8221; for all your woes is equally dumb.</p>
<p>My point is this:  Both sides of the political spectrum have their idiots; it&#8217;s your duty as an American to NOT be blinded by partisan rhetoric.  Quit being so goddamn right-wing JUST because you like guns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Pelto</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4597</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Pelto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4597</guid>
		<description>TO: Caleb
RE: [OT] CSS for Links, Part 2

MUCH better.

Thanks,

Chuck(le)
P.S. A bit more &#039;brightness&#039; on the hover-over-link if you please; cherry red as opposed to dark burgundy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: Caleb<br />
RE: [OT] CSS for Links, Part 2</p>
<p>MUCH better.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Chuck(le)<br />
P.S. A bit more &#8216;brightness&#8217; on the hover-over-link if you please; cherry red as opposed to dark burgundy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Pelto</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4574</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Pelto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4574</guid>
		<description>P.S. The contrasting color should brighten by at least two orders of magnitude when the cursor hovers over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. The contrasting color should brighten by at least two orders of magnitude when the cursor hovers over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Pelto</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Pelto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>TO: Caleb
RE: [OT] CSS for Links

I prefer bolded and highly contrasting colors. I avoid underlines as I think that styling is important for other uses on the blog; denoting section titles in a lengthy item.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[There is a method to this madness. Or there SHOULD be. -- CBPelto ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: Caleb<br />
RE: [OT] CSS for Links</p>
<p>I prefer bolded and highly contrasting colors. I avoid underlines as I think that styling is important for other uses on the blog; denoting section titles in a lengthy item.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Chuck(le)<br />
[There is a method to this madness. Or there SHOULD be. -- CBPelto ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4599</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4599</guid>
		<description>yeah, oddly enough I don&#039;t like that hyper links show up the same as bold text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, oddly enough I don&#8217;t like that hyper links show up the same as bold text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Pelto</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4600</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Pelto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4600</guid>
		<description>TO: All
RE: That Link....

....in my previoius item doesn&#039;t stand out very well.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080812160747.aspx&quot; title=&quot;Return of Fairness Doctrine Could Control Web Content&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Here It Is Again&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.....

Sorry about that. Maybe the CSS for links should be tweaked to stand out a bit more than the regular text here.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Good user interface is the hobgoblin of blogging.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: All<br />
RE: That Link&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;.in my previoius item doesn&#8217;t stand out very well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080812160747.aspx" title="Return of Fairness Doctrine Could Control Web Content" rel="nofollow"><b>Here It Is Again</b></a>&#8230;..</p>
<p>Sorry about that. Maybe the CSS for links should be tweaked to stand out a bit more than the regular text here.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Chuck(le)<br />
[Good user interface is the hobgoblin of blogging.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Pelto</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4598</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Pelto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4598</guid>
		<description>TO: All
RE: The &#039;Fairness&#039; Doctrine, Anyone?

If &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080812160747.aspx&quot; title=&quot;Return of Fairness Doctrine Could Control Web Content&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;THISE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is accurate, one would think that the so-called &#039;liberals&#039; would be &lt;b&gt;required&lt;/b&gt; to have conservative co-authors on their blogs.

Personally, I find this approach &#039;fairness&#039; reprehensible. BUT I suspect that the short-sighted &#039;liberals&#039; may suddenly realize they&#039;re about to let the dejinn out of a bottle, and that dejinn will make them VERY unhappy.

Therefore, I doubt if this is going to come to pass....unless it is so contorted that anyone can make anything they want out of it. And that would render it useless.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[ When he [the so-called &#039;liberal&#039;] speaketh fairness, believe him not: for there are seven abominations in his heart. -- Proverbs (updated and paraphrased)]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: All<br />
RE: The &#8216;Fairness&#8217; Doctrine, Anyone?</p>
<p>If <a href="http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080812160747.aspx" title="Return of Fairness Doctrine Could Control Web Content" rel="nofollow"><b>THISE</b></a> is accurate, one would think that the so-called &#8216;liberals&#8217; would be <b>required</b> to have conservative co-authors on their blogs.</p>
<p>Personally, I find this approach &#8216;fairness&#8217; reprehensible. BUT I suspect that the short-sighted &#8216;liberals&#8217; may suddenly realize they&#8217;re about to let the dejinn out of a bottle, and that dejinn will make them VERY unhappy.</p>
<p>Therefore, I doubt if this is going to come to pass&#8230;.unless it is so contorted that anyone can make anything they want out of it. And that would render it useless.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Chuck(le)<br />
[ When he [the so-called 'liberal'] speaketh fairness, believe him not: for there are seven abominations in his heart. &#8212; Proverbs (updated and paraphrased)]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurking Observer</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurking Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>One of the things I observed when blogging was new, before Kos and the rest, was that conservative bloggers sometimes invited liberal bloggers to join them on their blogs as co-bloggers. Not just guest-posts, but a regular forum for blogging.

But I &lt;b&gt;never&lt;/b&gt; saw a liberal blogger invite a conservative to join as a guest-host.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things I observed when blogging was new, before Kos and the rest, was that conservative bloggers sometimes invited liberal bloggers to join them on their blogs as co-bloggers. Not just guest-posts, but a regular forum for blogging.</p>
<p>But I <b>never</b> saw a liberal blogger invite a conservative to join as a guest-host.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Bowman</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4579</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/08/08/compare-and-contrast-2/#comment-4579</guid>
		<description>&quot;A disarmed society may not be any safer from crime overall, but it does distribute that risk evenly among pacifists and non-pacifists alike.&quot; --Joshua

&quot;The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.&quot; --Winston Churchill

&quot;Ann Coulter points out that liberals use people to convey their radical views who can not be politely challenged, like the Jersey Girls and Cindy Sheehan.&quot; --Tantor

Let&#039;s not forget Sarah Brady&#039;s favorite pull-toy, Jim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A disarmed society may not be any safer from crime overall, but it does distribute that risk evenly among pacifists and non-pacifists alike.&#8221; &#8211;Joshua</p>
<p>&#8220;The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.&#8221; &#8211;Winston Churchill</p>
<p>&#8220;Ann Coulter points out that liberals use people to convey their radical views who can not be politely challenged, like the Jersey Girls and Cindy Sheehan.&#8221; &#8211;Tantor</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not forget Sarah Brady&#8217;s favorite pull-toy, Jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

