<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Para Ordnance 16-40</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy Blob</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4900</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy Blob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4900</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say I share your fascination with Berettas, but I can Identify with your interest in Para-Os!  After the Glock 19/22/23, it&#039;s my favorite platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I share your fascination with Berettas, but I can Identify with your interest in Para-Os!  After the Glock 19/22/23, it&#8217;s my favorite platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4893</guid>
		<description>Magazines have always been the weak point of the Para-Ordnance double stackers. New ones aren&#039;t cheap, either, at $32.99 from &lt;a&gt;CDNN Sports&lt;/a&gt;.
Stay far away from Mec-Gar Para-Ord mags, they suck.
I have a P-14 myself, and shot it for a long time, but after acquiring a Kimber, I am no longer willing to put up with the poor build quality, sharp edges, and the extra weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Magazines have always been the weak point of the Para-Ordnance double stackers. New ones aren&#8217;t cheap, either, at $32.99 from <a>CDNN Sports</a>.<br />
Stay far away from Mec-Gar Para-Ord mags, they suck.<br />
I have a P-14 myself, and shot it for a long time, but after acquiring a Kimber, I am no longer willing to put up with the poor build quality, sharp edges, and the extra weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt G</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4898</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4898</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I can technically see how the weight of a tungston FLGR might help a race gun marginally, by putting extra weight out there on the muzzle. Hell, for that matter, why not make the bushing out the stuff?

But it ain&#039;t fittin&#039; for a fighting pistol, and my fighting 1911s function damned well without &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I can technically see how the weight of a tungston FLGR might help a race gun marginally, by putting extra weight out there on the muzzle. Hell, for that matter, why not make the bushing out the stuff?</p>
<p>But it ain&#8217;t fittin&#8217; for a fighting pistol, and my fighting 1911s function damned well without &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>oh man...need to customize guns....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh man&#8230;need to customize guns&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4895</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4895</guid>
		<description>PS: Actually, I can see the use of a FLGR on a run&#039;n&#039;gun race pistol, &#039;specially if it was made of tungsten. (Wilson, via Brownell&#039;s, pg. 15, $94.95) It would go well with the EGW fiber front sight. (pg. 36, $30.00)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: Actually, I can see the use of a FLGR on a run&#8217;n'gun race pistol, &#8216;specially if it was made of tungsten. (Wilson, via Brownell&#8217;s, pg. 15, $94.95) It would go well with the EGW fiber front sight. (pg. 36, $30.00)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4894</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4894</guid>
		<description>Matt,

We&#039;re workin&#039; on him; give us time. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>We&#8217;re workin&#8217; on him; give us time. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4907</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4907</guid>
		<description>You know, if I could get rid of one thing on this pistol it would be that damnable full length guide rod.

And jimbob, I do more than just shoot limited with this gun, I&#039;ll also carry it and carry my Para LTC as well - same basic platform and same method of operation.  Damn these 1911s for being so diverse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, if I could get rid of one thing on this pistol it would be that damnable full length guide rod.</p>
<p>And jimbob, I do more than just shoot limited with this gun, I&#8217;ll also carry it and carry my Para LTC as well &#8211; same basic platform and same method of operation.  Damn these 1911s for being so diverse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbob86</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4906</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbob86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4906</guid>
		<description>&quot;all the other accoutrement that you’d expect on a purpose built Limited pistol.&quot;

A gun for all occasions? As in a separate one for each occasion?  Specialization is robbing you of practice time and ammo moola for your Carry gun........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;all the other accoutrement that you’d expect on a purpose built Limited pistol.&#8221;</p>
<p>A gun for all occasions? As in a separate one for each occasion?  Specialization is robbing you of practice time and ammo moola for your Carry gun&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt G</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4905</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4905</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The pistol itself has forward and rearward serrations on the slide, adjustable sights, a full length guide rod and all the other accoutrement that you’d expect on a purpose built Limited pistol.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

You had me &#039;til FLGR, Caleb. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The pistol itself has forward and rearward serrations on the slide, adjustable sights, a full length guide rod and all the other accoutrement that you’d expect on a purpose built Limited pistol.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>You had me &#8217;til FLGR, Caleb. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTownTejas</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4897</link>
		<dc:creator>HTownTejas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrahab.com/2008/09/02/para-ordnance-16-40/#comment-4897</guid>
		<description>I had been looking at Para 1911s among others, and last Monday after all the blogger noise bought a .45 LTC and a Blackhawk Serpa holster.  Both are awesome, I loved shooting that gun last week and the holster (pancake) is rock solid, intuitive to draw from, and quick.

The blogger noise pushed me to buy the Para sooner, but I never would have bought the Blackhawk Serpa (looked gimmicky).  Both are awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been looking at Para 1911s among others, and last Monday after all the blogger noise bought a .45 LTC and a Blackhawk Serpa holster.  Both are awesome, I loved shooting that gun last week and the holster (pancake) is rock solid, intuitive to draw from, and quick.</p>
<p>The blogger noise pushed me to buy the Para sooner, but I never would have bought the Blackhawk Serpa (looked gimmicky).  Both are awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

