<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I hate magazine safeties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:45:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7465</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7465</guid>
		<description>even worse, i carry a ruger SR9... the manual specifically states that dry firing without a mag inserted will damage the gun... ill admit, ive ignored that a couple of times... but i probably shouldnt..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even worse, i carry a ruger SR9&#8230; the manual specifically states that dry firing without a mag inserted will damage the gun&#8230; ill admit, ive ignored that a couple of times&#8230; but i probably shouldnt..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weer'd Beard</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7445</link>
		<dc:creator>Weer'd Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7445</guid>
		<description>Also one must note the even bigger problem with mag disconnects beyond competition and practice, but also with defensive shooting.   If somehow you fail to seat your magazine properly,  or in the course of it ridding in your holster, or somehow in the course of being drawn or griped the magazine unseats, in a conventional gun without the disconnect you will likely experience one shot then some sort of failure.    In a gun with a disconnect you will have a gun unable to be fired.   That one shot could save your life, and certainly, while not ideal, is better than a gun unable to fire.

Also I don&#039;t know too much about the mechanics of the disconnects, nor how many variations exist, but I think of Sebastian&#039;s Bersa where the spring failed on the disconnect leaving him with an inoperable gun (unless it&#039;s held sideways).

This &quot;Safety&quot; feature could get you killed if employed in a defensive arm.

Also I&#039;m not a huge fan of a loaded gun giving a false negative to the shooter.    A gun with a round in the chamber and the magazine removed IS still loaded, but unable to fire, but will suddenly become &quot;hot&quot; with the introduction of an empty magazine, or the failure of the disconnect.

There is just no way this feature can be considered good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also one must note the even bigger problem with mag disconnects beyond competition and practice, but also with defensive shooting.   If somehow you fail to seat your magazine properly,  or in the course of it ridding in your holster, or somehow in the course of being drawn or griped the magazine unseats, in a conventional gun without the disconnect you will likely experience one shot then some sort of failure.    In a gun with a disconnect you will have a gun unable to be fired.   That one shot could save your life, and certainly, while not ideal, is better than a gun unable to fire.</p>
<p>Also I don&#8217;t know too much about the mechanics of the disconnects, nor how many variations exist, but I think of Sebastian&#8217;s Bersa where the spring failed on the disconnect leaving him with an inoperable gun (unless it&#8217;s held sideways).</p>
<p>This &#8220;Safety&#8221; feature could get you killed if employed in a defensive arm.</p>
<p>Also I&#8217;m not a huge fan of a loaded gun giving a false negative to the shooter.    A gun with a round in the chamber and the magazine removed IS still loaded, but unable to fire, but will suddenly become &#8220;hot&#8221; with the introduction of an empty magazine, or the failure of the disconnect.</p>
<p>There is just no way this feature can be considered good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZerCool</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7444</link>
		<dc:creator>ZerCool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7444</guid>
		<description>I have a Bersa Thunder .380 as my carry piece. I hate not being able to dry-fire without a magazine in, so I took the ten minutes yesterday to take out the mag safety bar. If my club had a BUG match and I wanted to shoot that gun, it would take me about ten minutes to put the disconnect back in.

A carry piece should go bang when the trigger is pulled, without having to worry about whether the magazine has been dislodged or dropped out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Bersa Thunder .380 as my carry piece. I hate not being able to dry-fire without a magazine in, so I took the ten minutes yesterday to take out the mag safety bar. If my club had a BUG match and I wanted to shoot that gun, it would take me about ten minutes to put the disconnect back in.</p>
<p>A carry piece should go bang when the trigger is pulled, without having to worry about whether the magazine has been dislodged or dropped out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; A safety feature that makes a gun less safe</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7442</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; A safety feature that makes a gun less safe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7442</guid>
		<description>[...] Why I hate magazine safeties: The problem with a magazine disconnect safety rears its ugly head when you have to dry fire the gun - because you can</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why I hate magazine safeties: The problem with a magazine disconnect safety rears its ugly head when you have to dry fire the gun &#8211; because you can</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Smith</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7423</link>
		<dc:creator>B Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7423</guid>
		<description>I agree with you completely. I have a .22 that I bought for my then-girlfriend which has a magazine safety. Having learned most of my (admittedly modest) pistol skills in the loving embrace of the US Army (and it was .45s, not 9mm),  I have cursed that little .22 to Hell and back, because clearing it goes counter to my every instinct so carefully drilled into me.
I refuse to sell it because, well, it&#039;s a pistol, and every time i have sold a gun in my life I have regretted it without fail. But the magazine safety is a deal breaker for me: I will probably never buy another with that feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you completely. I have a .22 that I bought for my then-girlfriend which has a magazine safety. Having learned most of my (admittedly modest) pistol skills in the loving embrace of the US Army (and it was .45s, not 9mm),  I have cursed that little .22 to Hell and back, because clearing it goes counter to my every instinct so carefully drilled into me.<br />
I refuse to sell it because, well, it&#8217;s a pistol, and every time i have sold a gun in my life I have regretted it without fail. But the magazine safety is a deal breaker for me: I will probably never buy another with that feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7406</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7406</guid>
		<description>I did check the IDPA rules, and they say that disabling any safety device is a naughty, so don&#039;t nerf your mag disconnect.  However, USPSA doesn&#039;t make this distinction, and I&#039;m hoping that IDPA will clarify this rule as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did check the IDPA rules, and they say that disabling any safety device is a naughty, so don&#8217;t nerf your mag disconnect.  However, USPSA doesn&#8217;t make this distinction, and I&#8217;m hoping that IDPA will clarify this rule as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmsmith</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7405</link>
		<dc:creator>cmsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7405</guid>
		<description>I know of four accicental/negligent discharge incidents where I think the magzine disconnnect was a factor.  Yes, other safety rules were violated, but the magazine disconnect is supposed to help - not make the situation worse.

One Browning; three S&amp;W.  One civilian; one cop; a professional police trainer; a firearms professional.  

Two fatalities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know of four accicental/negligent discharge incidents where I think the magzine disconnnect was a factor.  Yes, other safety rules were violated, but the magazine disconnect is supposed to help &#8211; not make the situation worse.</p>
<p>One Browning; three S&amp;W.  One civilian; one cop; a professional police trainer; a firearms professional.  </p>
<p>Two fatalities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trebor</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7399</link>
		<dc:creator>Trebor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7399</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a couple of issues with the IDPA &quot;dropping the hammer&quot; rule.

The first is that in IDPA you carry the gun around from stage to stage in your holster. You don&#039;t carry it in a range bag or case. Because it&#039;s holstered, the only way to make sure it&#039;s secure in the holster is to have it holstered with the slide forward. You can&#039;t securely carry a gun in a holster with the slide locked back.

Since the gun is going to be holstered, and the rules require a cold range, that&#039;s where the procedure to show unloaded comes from. It&#039;s an additional safety precaution.

Now, last time I looked, IDPA has a specific rule that said &quot;All safety devices on a gun must be in working order.&quot;  That means that removing or disabling a mag disconnect safety is actuallly violating the rule. 

I know local clubs may look the other way on this, but unless I mis understand the rule, this is against the rules and could result in a competitior being DQ&#039;d.

So, before you do this mod, check the IDPA rule book for yourself and follow up by checking with the SRO of the club that holds the match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a couple of issues with the IDPA &#8220;dropping the hammer&#8221; rule.</p>
<p>The first is that in IDPA you carry the gun around from stage to stage in your holster. You don&#8217;t carry it in a range bag or case. Because it&#8217;s holstered, the only way to make sure it&#8217;s secure in the holster is to have it holstered with the slide forward. You can&#8217;t securely carry a gun in a holster with the slide locked back.</p>
<p>Since the gun is going to be holstered, and the rules require a cold range, that&#8217;s where the procedure to show unloaded comes from. It&#8217;s an additional safety precaution.</p>
<p>Now, last time I looked, IDPA has a specific rule that said &#8220;All safety devices on a gun must be in working order.&#8221;  That means that removing or disabling a mag disconnect safety is actuallly violating the rule. </p>
<p>I know local clubs may look the other way on this, but unless I mis understand the rule, this is against the rules and could result in a competitior being DQ&#8217;d.</p>
<p>So, before you do this mod, check the IDPA rule book for yourself and follow up by checking with the SRO of the club that holds the match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJP</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7398</link>
		<dc:creator>TJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7398</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point, but the practice could be modified so that guns with a disconnector remain locked open. Or am I missing something here, such as the weapon must then be holstered? Probably. This is one of the reasons I like my 3rd gen Smiths and their decocking levers.

On the flip side, the gun won&#039;t discharge if the magazine isn&#039;t seated properly, where that discharge would likely produce a malfunction that had to be cleared, and the mag would fall out of the gun during recoil--necessitating insertion of a new mag and racking the slide to fill the empty chamber. Otherwise: a rap on the magazine and problem solved.

Yeah, so that&#039;s an amateur mistake. Though I am using it in a manner not originally intended, where its purpose was to render the gun &quot;safe&quot; simply by removal of the magazine. No weapon with a chambered round is safe for casual handling, as far as I&#039;m concerned.

Being a wheelgunner who loves a nice clean break on single action, I&#039;m not overly fond of sloppy triggers on guns with disconnectors. It&#039;s a traditional European design practice as much as it is lawyering, where the French government requested that feature in the enormously popular GP. I could take or leave the disconnector, but considering the prevalence of imported pistols, I have given up and made peace with the fact they exist.

What I don&#039;t like are internal locks, most of which are made of minuscule parts more appropriate for a ball point pen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point, but the practice could be modified so that guns with a disconnector remain locked open. Or am I missing something here, such as the weapon must then be holstered? Probably. This is one of the reasons I like my 3rd gen Smiths and their decocking levers.</p>
<p>On the flip side, the gun won&#8217;t discharge if the magazine isn&#8217;t seated properly, where that discharge would likely produce a malfunction that had to be cleared, and the mag would fall out of the gun during recoil&#8211;necessitating insertion of a new mag and racking the slide to fill the empty chamber. Otherwise: a rap on the magazine and problem solved.</p>
<p>Yeah, so that&#8217;s an amateur mistake. Though I am using it in a manner not originally intended, where its purpose was to render the gun &#8220;safe&#8221; simply by removal of the magazine. No weapon with a chambered round is safe for casual handling, as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
<p>Being a wheelgunner who loves a nice clean break on single action, I&#8217;m not overly fond of sloppy triggers on guns with disconnectors. It&#8217;s a traditional European design practice as much as it is lawyering, where the French government requested that feature in the enormously popular GP. I could take or leave the disconnector, but considering the prevalence of imported pistols, I have given up and made peace with the fact they exist.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t like are internal locks, most of which are made of minuscule parts more appropriate for a ball point pen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/03/16/why-i-hate-magazine-safeties/#comment-7393</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=2787#comment-7393</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really not a violation of rule 1 or 3 though - when you dry fire the gun, you&#039;re treating it like it&#039;s loaded.  On top of that, when you dry fire the gun under USPSA/IDPA rules, the gun MUST be pointed downrange and &quot;on target&quot;, so that in the event that your gun does go &quot;bang&quot;, the bullet goes into the intended target, which in this case is the berm.

Dropping the hammer on an empty chamber with the magazine out is the most efficient way to make sure that everyone&#039;s gun is in the same condition - safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really not a violation of rule 1 or 3 though &#8211; when you dry fire the gun, you&#8217;re treating it like it&#8217;s loaded.  On top of that, when you dry fire the gun under USPSA/IDPA rules, the gun MUST be pointed downrange and &#8220;on target&#8221;, so that in the event that your gun does go &#8220;bang&#8221;, the bullet goes into the intended target, which in this case is the berm.</p>
<p>Dropping the hammer on an empty chamber with the magazine out is the most efficient way to make sure that everyone&#8217;s gun is in the same condition &#8211; safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

