<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beretta Px4 Storm C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2009/04/13/beretta-px4-storm-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/04/13/beretta-px4-storm-c/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/04/13/beretta-px4-storm-c/#comment-8975</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3052#comment-8975</guid>
		<description>I am still confused, but I am a major newbie.  How does a &quot;constant action&quot; pistol - C, differ from their D - &quot;double action&quot; model?  By this I mean, in practical terms, if both contain a spurless hammer, then all you do is point and shoot, like a Glock?  Isn&#039;t that more like a striker fire pistol, or is constant action another name for striker fired?  Can someone please clear up this confusion for me.  To put it simply, I much prefer a striker fired pistol, so which of these two PX4 models - C or D - most resembles a striker fired handgun?  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still confused, but I am a major newbie.  How does a &#8220;constant action&#8221; pistol &#8211; C, differ from their D &#8211; &#8220;double action&#8221; model?  By this I mean, in practical terms, if both contain a spurless hammer, then all you do is point and shoot, like a Glock?  Isn&#8217;t that more like a striker fire pistol, or is constant action another name for striker fired?  Can someone please clear up this confusion for me.  To put it simply, I much prefer a striker fired pistol, so which of these two PX4 models &#8211; C or D &#8211; most resembles a striker fired handgun?  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jokout</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/04/13/beretta-px4-storm-c/#comment-8514</link>
		<dc:creator>jokout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3052#comment-8514</guid>
		<description>Well actually, the &quot;C&quot; variant has a &quot;spurless hammer&quot; that sets flush with the rear of the slide when in the cocked position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well actually, the &#8220;C&#8221; variant has a &#8220;spurless hammer&#8221; that sets flush with the rear of the slide when in the cocked position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/04/13/beretta-px4-storm-c/#comment-8432</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3052#comment-8432</guid>
		<description>No, the &quot;C&quot; models are &lt;i&gt;sans&lt;/i&gt; hammer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the &#8220;C&#8221; models are <i>sans</i> hammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/04/13/beretta-px4-storm-c/#comment-8431</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3052#comment-8431</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t it have a hammer like other Px4&#039;s? I&#039;m thinking it would.

Also, front and rear sights on Storms are mounted in dovetails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t it have a hammer like other Px4&#8242;s? I&#8217;m thinking it would.</p>
<p>Also, front and rear sights on Storms are mounted in dovetails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weer'd Beard</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/04/13/beretta-px4-storm-c/#comment-8427</link>
		<dc:creator>Weer'd Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3052#comment-8427</guid>
		<description>Like that they removed the thumb safety from it.    No need with the DAO trigger.

Neat guns, I&#039;d love to try one out.    Still  Odd that with the rotating barrel delayed-blowback action that the bore axis is still so high....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like that they removed the thumb safety from it.    No need with the DAO trigger.</p>
<p>Neat guns, I&#8217;d love to try one out.    Still  Odd that with the rotating barrel delayed-blowback action that the bore axis is still so high&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughingdog</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/04/13/beretta-px4-storm-c/#comment-8417</link>
		<dc:creator>Laughingdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3052#comment-8417</guid>
		<description>One of the other instructors at the range got one of the earlier Px4 models a couple of years ago.  In terms of overall feel, it just didn&#039;t jump out at me.  But the trigger on it was very  nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the other instructors at the range got one of the earlier Px4 models a couple of years ago.  In terms of overall feel, it just didn&#8217;t jump out at me.  But the trigger on it was very  nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

