<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .38 Super question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/15/38-super-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/15/38-super-question/</link>
	<description>Gun info by shooters, for shooters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/15/38-super-question/#comment-11949</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3874#comment-11949</guid>
		<description>Sharps - no, the idea was to buy a commander sized .38 Super and convert it to a 9 Silliliter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharps &#8211; no, the idea was to buy a commander sized .38 Super and convert it to a 9 Silliliter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Duck</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/15/38-super-question/#comment-11943</link>
		<dc:creator>The Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3874#comment-11943</guid>
		<description>Recently attempted the same thing.
In addition to fitting the barrel, &amp; using 9mm mags, you do have to have the extractor tuned.

I tried 2 gunsmiths, &amp; one was I guess already too busy, the other suggested I start reloading, instead of rebarreling, so I went the simple route &amp; traded the 38 Super on a new Kimber 9mm

But it is a pretty straight forward swap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently attempted the same thing.<br />
In addition to fitting the barrel, &amp; using 9mm mags, you do have to have the extractor tuned.</p>
<p>I tried 2 gunsmiths, &amp; one was I guess already too busy, the other suggested I start reloading, instead of rebarreling, so I went the simple route &amp; traded the 38 Super on a new Kimber 9mm</p>
<p>But it is a pretty straight forward swap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharps4070ss</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/15/38-super-question/#comment-11941</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharps4070ss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3874#comment-11941</guid>
		<description>D&#039;OH
I feel like a dummy... I read your post backwards. I thought you wanted to go from 9MM to 38 Super, not the other way around.

I wouldn&#039;t bother to go THAT direction.  
The 1911 was originally designed for a &quot;long&quot; cartridge such as the 45ACP.  When you try to get the &quot;short&quot; cartridges like the 9MM (9x19) or the 40S&amp;W to run, you usually end up messing with the feed lips on the mags or just seating the bullets further out of the case.

I recently built a 40S&amp;W for IPSC, and I have trouble with factory ammo feeding because it is shorter than my competition loads.

I&#039;m not saying it can&#039;t be done, but it might be more trouble than it&#039;s worth (if you reload, that is. If you don&#039;t reload, then yes, it would be worth having a gunsmith tune it to run right)

Hope this makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;OH<br />
I feel like a dummy&#8230; I read your post backwards. I thought you wanted to go from 9MM to 38 Super, not the other way around.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t bother to go THAT direction.<br />
The 1911 was originally designed for a &#8220;long&#8221; cartridge such as the 45ACP.  When you try to get the &#8220;short&#8221; cartridges like the 9MM (9&#215;19) or the 40S&amp;W to run, you usually end up messing with the feed lips on the mags or just seating the bullets further out of the case.</p>
<p>I recently built a 40S&amp;W for IPSC, and I have trouble with factory ammo feeding because it is shorter than my competition loads.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it can&#8217;t be done, but it might be more trouble than it&#8217;s worth (if you reload, that is. If you don&#8217;t reload, then yes, it would be worth having a gunsmith tune it to run right)</p>
<p>Hope this makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/15/38-super-question/#comment-11939</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3874#comment-11939</guid>
		<description>The answer is &quot;probably&quot;.

99% of the time it&#039;s as simple as swapping barrels and magazines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is &#8220;probably&#8221;.</p>
<p>99% of the time it&#8217;s as simple as swapping barrels and magazines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharps4070ss</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/15/38-super-question/#comment-11938</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharps4070ss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3874#comment-11938</guid>
		<description>Jeff is right about the rims, 
but....

38 Super Comp is a rimless 38 Super.
You might have to tweek the extractor, and brass is rare, but it would be an easy conversion.
The ejector may be too long also. (maybe yes/ maybe no)

John,
38 super comp is virtually identical to 9x23win, 9x23 largo, 9x23super comp, etc, etc, etc, (except for minor dimensional difference here and there)
The 38 bullet is a tiny bit larger (diameter) than 9mm, (which is why you shouldn&#039;t  shoot 38 super in a 9x23win, even though some people do) 

9x23win is a super high pressure round.  I would NEVER, EVER shoot a 9x23win through a 38super.
Only shoot 9x23win in a gun built for it.
(9x23win is a 223rem case cut off)

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff is right about the rims,<br />
but&#8230;.</p>
<p>38 Super Comp is a rimless 38 Super.<br />
You might have to tweek the extractor, and brass is rare, but it would be an easy conversion.<br />
The ejector may be too long also. (maybe yes/ maybe no)</p>
<p>John,<br />
38 super comp is virtually identical to 9x23win, 9&#215;23 largo, 9x23super comp, etc, etc, etc, (except for minor dimensional difference here and there)<br />
The 38 bullet is a tiny bit larger (diameter) than 9mm, (which is why you shouldn&#8217;t  shoot 38 super in a 9x23win, even though some people do) </p>
<p>9x23win is a super high pressure round.  I would NEVER, EVER shoot a 9x23win through a 38super.<br />
Only shoot 9x23win in a gun built for it.<br />
(9x23win is a 223rem case cut off)</p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Myers</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/15/38-super-question/#comment-11936</link>
		<dc:creator>John Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3874#comment-11936</guid>
		<description>No reason it shouldn&#039;t work. 9mm and .38 Super are quit similar, with the major difference being the later is semi-rimmed vs. rimless. Ballistics are similar with .38 Super about equivalent to 9mm +P. Another good thing about .38 Super is you should be able to chamber, feed and fire 9x23mm and get a boost in ballistics up to .357 Sig levels. And being rimless, 9x23 actually feeds more reliably than .38 Super, which is a bit prone to feeding difficulties. I had a G20 barrel in .38 Super that fed better in 9x23. And I have a .38 Super slide for my EAA Witness-P that will handle 9x23 fine.

Go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No reason it shouldn&#8217;t work. 9mm and .38 Super are quit similar, with the major difference being the later is semi-rimmed vs. rimless. Ballistics are similar with .38 Super about equivalent to 9mm +P. Another good thing about .38 Super is you should be able to chamber, feed and fire 9x23mm and get a boost in ballistics up to .357 Sig levels. And being rimless, 9&#215;23 actually feeds more reliably than .38 Super, which is a bit prone to feeding difficulties. I had a G20 barrel in .38 Super that fed better in 9&#215;23. And I have a .38 Super slide for my EAA Witness-P that will handle 9&#215;23 fine.</p>
<p>Go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff the Baptist</title>
		<link>http://gunnuts.net/2009/07/15/38-super-question/#comment-11935</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff the Baptist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunnuts.net/?p=3874#comment-11935</guid>
		<description>The rim geometries are different.  .38 super is semi-rimmed, 9mm isn&#039;t.  It might work, but I kind of doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rim geometries are different.  .38 super is semi-rimmed, 9mm isn&#8217;t.  It might work, but I kind of doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

