Mitt Romney on guns

January 16, 2012
By

Don’t worry, we’re not going to start doing politics here at Gun Nuts, but my friends at PA Gun Blog have a very interesting post up on Mitt Romney’s actual record on the 2nd Amendment. It’s an interesting read and worth your time.

This entry was posted on January 16, 2012 at 07:06 and is filed under politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

12 Responses to Mitt Romney on guns

  1. Joe on January 16, 2012 at 13:28

    This is real easy Ladies and Gents. Just look at Mass anti gun laws if you want to know the truth. Enough said

  2. Woody on January 16, 2012 at 14:55

    It “is what it is”. Vote for Romney or Obama. Pretty simple now, isn’t it !!!

  3. Gerard on January 16, 2012 at 14:59

    I was born and raised in Boston. Mitt Romney qualifies as “he’s not Obama” and very little else.

  4. eck! on January 16, 2012 at 15:49

    I not a fan of flipper as his presence in the state was unremarkable to me until I started thinking about guns.

    When I first came here (1979) I remember the signs, THose one was Massachusetes mandatory gun law aand it’s something about 1year in jail. After that sign was the more usual Welcome to MA.

    Yes, the current laws suck. but in reality they did get better. No, they aren’t where they should be though. So yes, getting somewhat better is Mittens and gun owners lobbies fault. The fact that they didn’t get much better is the other sides fault, still!

    Put blame where blame is due, MA legislature is anti gun.

    Eck!

  5. Don on January 16, 2012 at 18:55

    It’s easy for RED State Republicans with Republican Legislators to find fault with a BLUE State Republican who had to work with a Democrat controlled House & Senate. I’m not a fan of his 2nd Amendment, Health Care, or or “Social” record, but I think he did what he could in that State. To call him a RINO or not a TRUE conservative is nuts and will get us four more years of Obama. Grow up before before America goes under.

    • colorless.blue.ideas on January 18, 2012 at 07:04

      Politics remains the realm of the possible, not the perfect.

      Each candidate has specific things I dislike. Some have more than others.

      The challenge is to make the best choice possible in each situation. The questions should revolve around who would help the most or harm the least in the current situation.

      I have no clear favorite among the Republicans. Between any one of the Republicans and the incumbent, I find the choice easy to make.

  6. Joshua on January 16, 2012 at 21:20

    I’m just going to vote for Ron Paul like the GOA tells me. Everybody else is just insanity personified trying to project their own craziness onto Paul.

  7. Joe on January 17, 2012 at 04:06

    The only diff in this race is do you want a black or white president otherwise there is no diff in their politics.

  8. Joe on January 17, 2012 at 04:14

    Obama will WIN!!!… We have become a society (99%) of entitlement and want the Govt to take care of us and that’s what obama has to offer.

  9. John on January 17, 2012 at 04:35

    I wish you’d stayed with no politics at all since there is more than enough everywhere else but since you brought it up I don’t care. The problem is that Mitt is such a slimeball I would ‘t trust him to take my garbage out. The guy just oozes oily smugness and will literally say whatever people want to hear. Vote for him and you get what you deserve.

  10. Joe on January 17, 2012 at 11:50

    Plus 1 for what John said.

  11. woodfoot on January 18, 2012 at 17:03

    any repub nominee will be better than obasma. remember perot, the 3rd party sounded good but blew the election the wrong way. DON’T LET IT HAPPEN AGAIN. back the nominee period…